Categories
Uncategorized

Kinesics

In the image above we notice all the characters in the image demonstrating kinesics, which defined by the textbook is “the study of how we use body movement and facial expression.” The characters in the image are using facial expressions and their arms or hands to display how they are feeling. They all appear to be frustrated or upset, which shows how one emotion can be displayed by different body movements or expressions. This not only demonstrates the ambiguity of nonverbal communication, but also shows that it is continuous. Continuous means that the communication is in constant motion, unlike verbal communication which has a clear beginning and end.

This relates to everyday life because one is always expressing themselves with facial expressions. Sometimes, one makes a facial expression out of habit, unconsciously. For example, when using my phone I tend to scowl because I got used to scowling while on my phone. My partner constantly reminds me to stop scowling while using my phone. Unconsciously making expressions or body movements is a difference between verbal and nonverbal communication. In the image above, some characters may be unconsciously, making body movements. Once again, they all seem to be upset and sometimes people don’t think clearly when they’re upset. This suggests the body movements are done unconsciously, like squeezing your fists in anger. Kinesics can be expressed both consciously and unconsciously, as well as be continuous.

Categories
Uncategorized

Ambiguous Symbols

In the image above the person with the striped sweater is asking the person with the hat how much he wants for cutting the grass. The person with the hat misunderstands and replies with not wanting to cut the grass much.
The textbook defines verbal communication as “an agreed-upon and rule-governed system of symbols used to share meaning.” Symbols are defined as “arbitrary representations of thoughts, ideas, emotions, objects, or actions used to encode and decode meaning.” Although, symbols are not only arbitrary they are also ambiguous. A perfect example of the ambiguity of symbols is the editorial cartoon above. The ambiguity can be seen in the two meanings of the question asked by the person in the striped sweater. One definition could be about how much money one would want for cutting the grass, and another definition could be how much of the grass would one want to cut.
Everyone goes through this at times and we have to ask for clarification. Sometimes, we even make a joke about it. Although, it is not a difficult or “a hard, hard language” like the person on the couch thinks. This is because there are an agreed-upon system of symbols and a limited number of  possible meanings for our symbols. 

Categories
Uncategorized

The Linear Model of Communication: Awkward Silence

The cartoon above shows four people standing in an elevator, which can sometimes be awkward. They all seem to be in an uncomfortable situation which can be seen in their facial expressions.

In the Linear Model of Communication, communication moves in one direction, from the sender to the receiver. If that was true, communication between people would lead to an awkward silence. Thus, the transactional model of communication makes more sense, which states that the parties are both senders and receivers and exchange information simultaneously. In the linear model of communication, noise or sounds that are outside of the communication between two parties is there to interfere with the sending or receiving of the message. Although,  noise could be used to add to the conversation between two people. Therefore, I believe the transactional model of communication is the better definition. Noise could be used by both parties to add to the conversation. Additionally, instead of the receiver misinterpreting information like in the linear model, in the transactional model there shouldn’t be any miscommunication. The idea that both parties are senders and receivers should allow both parties to ask for clarification.

Everyone has experienced an awkward silence, especially when meeting someone new. Now, whenever I’m in an awkward silence, I’ll think of the Linear Model of Communication and decide to use the “noise” to restart the conversation or add to the conversation.